Delivering a Housing Capital Programme: Why It Matters for Local Government

In today’s dynamic and increasingly complex landscape of housing and urban development, local authorities and housing providers across the United Kingdom are grappling with the urgent challenge of maintaining, upgrading, and future-proofing their housing stock. With rising expectations from residents, tighter regulatory frameworks, and the imperative to meet sustainability targets, the pressure on councils to deliver effective housing capital programmes has never been greater.

Mark Baigent’s guide, How To Deliver A Housing Capital Programme, offers a timely and practical framework for navigating these challenges. It provides not only technical advice but also strategic insights that are crucial for local government leaders, housing officers, and policy makers who are tasked with stewarding public resources and delivering long-term value to communities.

Understanding the Capital Programme

A housing capital programme is fundamentally about investing in the future of housing assets. Unlike routine maintenance, which addresses immediate issues, capital programmes focus on planned improvements and major works that enhance the quality, safety, and longevity of homes. These include large-scale interventions such as roof replacements, window upgrades, boiler installations, and energy efficiency retrofits.

The guide makes a clear distinction between revenue costs, such as minor repairs and servicing, and capital expenditure, which involves significant investment in the physical fabric of buildings. Strategic planning is essential here. Reactive maintenance may seem cost-effective in the short term, but over time it leads to inefficiencies, higher costs, and deteriorating living conditions. A well-structured capital programme helps local authorities shift from a reactive to a proactive approach, ensuring better outcomes for residents and more sustainable use of public funds.

Subscribe to the Truth about Local Government podcast

Key Themes from the Guide

Balancing Repairs and Major Works

Baigent recommends a 70:30 split in favour of planned works over reactive repairs. This ratio reflects a strategic shift towards preventative maintenance and long-term asset management. For local authorities, this means fewer emergency call-outs, reduced disruption for tenants, and improved financial predictability.

Stock Condition and Asset Management

Robust asset management begins with accurate data. Councils must maintain up-to-date records of their housing stock, including age, condition, and maintenance history. This information underpins effective decision-making and ensures that capital investment is targeted where it is most needed. The guide emphasises the importance of aligning asset management with broader business planning, enabling councils to forecast costs, prioritise interventions, and demonstrate accountability.

Governance and Procurement

Strong governance structures are essential for delivering housing programmes that are transparent, efficient, and responsive. Baigent explores various procurement models, highlighting the need for clear roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes. For local government, this means establishing frameworks that support timely approvals, risk management, and value for money.

Resident Engagement

Engaging residents is not merely a procedural requirement, it is a cornerstone of successful housing delivery. The guide outlines best practices for involving tenants and leaseholders in planning and implementation, particularly when works affect their homes or service charges. Meaningful engagement builds trust, reduces resistance, and ensures that programmes reflect the needs and preferences of the community.

Performance Monitoring

Measuring success is critical. Baigent provides guidance on setting performance indicators that track both operational efficiency and resident satisfaction. For councils, this means being able to demonstrate impact, justify investment, and continuously improve service delivery.

Why This Matters to Elected Members

For councillors, housing capital programmes are not just technical undertakings, they are deeply political. These programmes are visible, tangible expressions of a council’s commitment to its residents. They shape public perception, influence electoral outcomes, and reflect the values and priorities of local leadership.

Investing in housing stock is also a matter of social justice. Many councillors represent communities where poor housing conditions contribute to health inequalities, educational disadvantage, and economic hardship. A well-planned capital programme can help address these systemic issues, offering residents not just better homes, but better life chances.

Moreover, capital programmes are a key lever for delivering on broader policy goals, such as climate action, regeneration, and inclusive growth. Councillors who understand and champion these programmes are better equipped to advocate for their communities, secure funding, and build cross-party consensus around long-term investment.

Why This Matters to Housing Officers

For officers leading housing functions, capital programmes are central to delivering high-quality, sustainable services. These programmes are where strategic planning meets operational delivery, where long-term visions are translated into real-world outcomes.

Officers are often the bridge between political ambition and practical implementation. Understanding the importance of capital investment enables them to make the case for resources, manage risk, and align housing delivery with corporate priorities. It also empowers them to innovate, whether through new procurement models, digital asset management tools, or resident co-design approaches.

In a context of rising demand, regulatory scrutiny, and financial pressure, capital programmes offer a structured way to manage complexity and deliver impact. Officers who engage deeply with this agenda are not just managing buildings, they are shaping the future of local housing systems.

Why This Matters for Local Government

Local authorities are stewards of public housing and public funds. In recent years, many councils have faced significant challenges: ageing housing stock, constrained budgets, and growing demand for affordable, safe, and energy-efficient homes. The consequences of underinvestment are visible in rising repair backlogs, tenant dissatisfaction, and increased health and safety risks.

A well-executed housing capital programme is not just a technical exercise, it is a strategic imperative. It enables councils to:

• Improve living conditions for thousands of residents

• Meet legal and regulatory obligations, including building safety and decarbonisation targets

• Optimise financial resources through planned investment rather than reactive spending

• Strengthen community trust through transparent and inclusive processes

• Support local economies by creating jobs and stimulating construction activity

In the context of climate change, housing inequality, and post-pandemic recovery, the role of local government in delivering high-quality housing has never been more critical. Baigent’s guide provides a roadmap for councils to rise to this challenge with confidence, clarity, and commitment.

Final Thoughts

How To Deliver A Housing Capital Programme is more than a manual, it is a strategic toolkit for local authorities seeking to transform their housing delivery. It encourages a shift in mindset from short-term fixes to long-term stewardship, from reactive management to proactive planning, and from isolated decision-making to collaborative governance.

For housing professionals, councillors, and policy advisors, this guide offers a compelling vision of what is possible when capital programmes are delivered with purpose, precision, and people at the heart.