Setting Ambition in Local Government Reorganisation: A Conversation with Jon Ainger

In the ever-evolving landscape of local government, reorganisation is often framed as a technical exercise a structural reshuffle designed to streamline services, reduce duplication, and deliver efficiencies. But what if it could be more than that? What if it could be a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reimagine public services, redefine purpose, and set bold, transformative ambitions for the future? That was the central theme of a compelling and timely conversation between Matthew Masters and Jon Ainger, Partner at IMPOWER Consulting. Their dialogue, rich in insight and grounded in real-world experience, offers a masterclass in how to think beyond the mechanics of local government reorganisation (LGR) and instead focus on what truly matters: purpose, people, and potential.

“It’s not the finish line it’s the starting line.”

Jon Ainger begins with a powerful reframing of how we should view LGR not as an endpoint, but as the beginning of a new chapter.

“It’s about raising your sights and looking beyond the vesting day… asking yourself the why. Why are we doing this? What are we doing it for? What goals do we have?”

This is a critical shift in mindset. Too often, the focus of LGR is on the immediate and the operational: who reports to whom, what the new council boundaries will be, how services will be merged. These are important questions, but they are not the most important. Ainger challenges leaders to look past these immediate concerns and instead ask deeper, more strategic questions: What kind of outcomes do we want for our communities? What kind of organisation do we want to become? What legacy do we want to leave? This is not just a philosophical exercise it is a practical imperative. Without a clear and compelling ambition, organisations risk becoming rudderless during the transition. Worse still, they risk losing their most valuable asset: their people.

“If all you’ve got is a loss mindset as a leader… good staff might leave. You need something to inspire them, to keep them coming to work.”

The Cost of Inaction: Drifting Without Direction

Ainger is candid about the risks of failing to set a bold ambition. Without a vision for the post-LGR world, councils may find themselves adrift during the transition period potentially up to two years before new structures are fully in place.

“What are you going to do in the interim period between now and then to continue that transformation journey?”

Subscribe to the Truth about Local Government podcast

This is not just about keeping the lights on. It’s about using the time wisely to invest in change, improve outcomes, and build momentum. The absence of a shared ambition can lead to inertia, confusion, and missed opportunities. It can also erode trust both internally among staff and externally among residents. Ainger warns that the vacuum created by a lack of vision can quickly be filled by fear, resistance, and retrenchment. In contrast, a clear ambition provides a north star a guiding light that helps leaders make decisions, prioritise investments, and galvanise their teams.

From Theory to Practice: The Edgework Approach

One of the most compelling parts of the conversation is Ainger’s explanation of Edgework IMPOWER’s practical framework for navigating complex change in public services.

“You can’t just have good project management. You can’t just have good analytics. You’ve actually got to have some practical skills to help implement the change.”

Edgework is not a methodology in the traditional sense. It is a philosophy of change grounded in real-world experience and built around a set of core capabilities that go beyond traditional consultancy. These include:

• Reframing Ambition: Helping leaders articulate a bold, shared vision that goes beyond structural change and focuses on outcomes.

• Unlocking People’s Participation: Engaging staff, stakeholders, and citizens as active participants in the change process.

• Delivering at the Front Line: Ensuring credibility and impact where it matters most on the ground, in communities, with those delivering and receiving services.

“If you’re not engaging people right at the core of it, it will fail. But it’s also a massive energy source for change.”

This emphasis on people on participation, trust, and frontline delivery is what sets Edgework apart. It’s not about imposing change from above; it’s about co-creating it with those who live and breathe public service every day.

The Power of Data: The IMPOWER Index

Another standout moment in the conversation is the discussion of IMPOWER’s data set, which Masters describes as “absolutely the business.” “Words mean nothing without data,” he says. “And that’s what I’m just so impressed with the approach that Jon is taking.”

At the heart of this approach is the IMPOWER Index, a comprehensive data set covering all of local government in England. But this isn’t just about benchmarking or league tables. It’s about understanding what good looks like and how to get there.

“We talk about better outcomes should cost less. And we feel that genuinely to be true.”

The Index focuses on the big-ticket, demand-led services children’s social care, adult social care, housing, waste, and so on. It uses the CIPFA nearest neighbours algorithm to ensure fair comparisons, stripping out the “unfairness” of comparing, say, London with the North East. “It’s not fair to compare London’s temporary accommodation costs with somewhere in the North East. But CIPFA allows you to strip that out and compare with the 10 organisations most like you.”

This enables councils to have honest, evidence-based conversations about performance, productivity, and priorities. And it often reveals surprising insights.

“Often, what good looks like is absent from a definition amongst the top team… It’s not necessarily shared.”

By surfacing these gaps and prompting strategic dialogue, the Index becomes more than a diagnostic tool it becomes a catalyst for change.

What Does Good Look Like?

One of the most profound insights from the conversation is the realisation that many councils do not have a shared definition of what “good” looks like. This absence can lead to misalignment, inefficiency, and missed opportunities.

“If people have a definition of what good looks like, it’ll be partial. And it’s not necessarily shared across the top team.”

This is where the IMPOWER Index becomes invaluable. It provides a common language and a shared evidence base that enables leaders to have meaningful conversations about priorities, trade-offs, and ambitions. It also helps to move the conversation beyond money and regulation towards outcomes, impact, and value.

A Vision for 2030: What Success Could Look Like

So what does success look like five years from now? Ainger offers two powerful visions.

First, no dip in core service performance during the transition. That means no Ofsted failures, no collapse in adult social care, no loss of quality.

“If we can maintain quality in services during the change, that would be a tick.”

Second, a reinvigorated connection between citizens and local government, driven by the rise of directly elected mayors.

“There is a democratic deficit with local government… If we can have mayors who provide a connection to place, even if that place is large, I think that will improve local government’s standing.”

This is not just about visibility or branding. It’s about legitimacy, accountability, and trust. If citizens can see a clear line between their vote and the services they receive, local government becomes more relevant and more resilient.

Great I've found several compelling examples of successful local government reorganisation in the UK, along with expert commentary that can enrich your blog post. Here's an expanded section to integrate into your article, deepening the narrative with real-world case studies and authoritative voices.

Learning from Success: Real-World Examples of Local Government Reorganisation

While the theory of ambition-led reorganisation is powerful, its credibility is strengthened when grounded in real-world success. Across the UK, several councils have already demonstrated what’s possible when reorganisation is approached not just as a structural exercise, but as a strategic opportunity to improve lives, unlock productivity, and build trust.

1. Greater Cambridge Shared Planning: AI-Driven Collaboration

The partnership between South Cambridgeshire District Council and Cambridge City Council to form the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service is a standout example of innovation through collaboration. By integrating artificial intelligence into planning consultations, the councils have not only streamlined processes but also enhanced public engagement and transparency. “This is not just about efficiency it’s about democratising planning and making it more accessible to the people it affects,” said a senior officer involved in the project. This initiative exemplifies how shared services, when underpinned by ambition and technology, can deliver smarter, more responsive governance.

2. Hillingdon Council: Family Hubs as a Model for Integrated Services

In Hillingdon, the council took a bold step by self-funding the development of family hubs, despite not being part of the government’s funded pilot areas. These hubs bring together services for children, young people, and families under one roof, creating a more holistic and accessible support system.

“We recognised that the value of integrated service delivery far outweighed the cost. It’s about meeting people where they are, not where the system is,” said a Hillingdon spokesperson.

This model has since been cited as a blueprint for other councils exploring how to deliver more with less by focusing on outcomes, not just outputs.

3. Birmingham City Council: The Foundry Programme

Faced with significant organisational challenges, Birmingham City Council launched the Foundry Programme in 2023 to rebuild leadership capacity and drive cultural change. The programme focused on data-driven decision-making, leadership development, and cross-departmental collaboration.

“Leadership commitment creates the conditions for sustainable change,” noted one of the programme’s architects.

The Foundry Programme is a powerful reminder that reorganisation is not just about structures it’s about people, culture, and the courage to lead differently.

4. North Yorkshire: From Two-Tier to Unitary

One of the most high-profile examples of structural reorganisation is North Yorkshire’s transition to a unitary authority in 2023. The move consolidated eight councils into one, with the aim of simplifying governance and improving service delivery.

“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a council that is truly fit for the future,”

said Richard Flinton, Chief Executive of North Yorkshire Council.

Early evaluations suggest that the new authority has already achieved significant savings while maintaining service quality a testament to the power of clear ambition and strong leadership.

Expert Voices: What the Sector Is Saying

To further enrich the conversation, it’s worth hearing from other thought leaders in the field of local government reform.

Simon Goacher, Head of Local Government at Weightmans LLP, emphasises the importance of legal clarity and governance during transitions:

“Reorganisation is not just a political or operational challenge it’s a legal one. Councils must ensure that governance structures are robust, transparent, and future-proofed.”

Dr. Catherine Staite, former Director of INLOGOV, has long argued that ambition must be rooted in community outcomes:

“The most successful reorganisations are those that start with the citizen, not the structure. If you begin with what people need and work backwards, the organisational form becomes a means to an end not the end itself.”

Professor Colin Talbot, public policy expert, adds a note of caution:

“Reorganisation can be a distraction if not handled well. It must be accompanied by a clear strategy for service improvement, workforce engagement, and financial sustainability.”

These voices reinforce the central thesis of the conversation between Masters and Ainger: that ambition is not optional it is essential.

Conclusion: Reorganisation as a Platform for Purpose

The conversation between Matthew Masters and Jon Ainger is not just a reflection on local government reorganisation it is a call to action. It challenges councils to move beyond the administrative and into the aspirational. And as the examples from Greater Cambridge, Hillingdon, Birmingham, and North Yorkshire show, this is not only possible it is already happening. These councils didn’t wait for perfect conditions. They acted with clarity, courage, and a commitment to outcomes. Whether through AI-powered planning, integrated family hubs, leadership transformation, or structural consolidation, each case demonstrates that reorganisation can be a platform for purpose not just process.

And they are not alone. Experts across the sector from legal advisors to policy scholars echo the same message: ambition must be at the heart of any reform. It must be rooted in community needs, supported by data, and driven by leadership that is both bold and inclusive. "If you are involved in local reorganisation and you haven't seen John's data, my God go and see it. Have a chat with him anyway, bye for now from us. Have a great day."