Understanding the Difference Between the General Fund and the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) – And Why It Matters

In the intricate and often opaque world of local government finance, few distinctions carry as much weight – yet remain as frequently misunderstood – as the one between the General Fund and the Housing Revenue Account (HRA). These two financial structures underpin the way councils operate, allocate resources, and deliver services to their communities. For professionals working across planning, housing, finance, policy, and executive leadership, a clear understanding of how these funds differ is not merely a technical necessity – it is a strategic imperative.

Grasping the nuances between the General Fund and the HRA is essential for ensuring legal compliance, maintaining financial transparency, and making informed decisions that support long-term sustainability. It also enables professionals to better navigate the constraints and opportunities within their respective domains, especially when balancing competing priorities in an era of tightening budgets and rising demand.

Subscribe to the Truth about Local Government podcast

What Are They, and How Do They Work?

The General Fund

The General Fund is the central financial account through which councils manage the vast majority of their public services. This includes everything from adult social care and children’s services to waste collection, public health, libraries, parks, and leisure centres. It is the financial backbone of local government operations, supporting both statutory and discretionary services that shape the everyday lives of residents.

Funding for the General Fund comes from a mix of sources: Council Tax, Business Rates, central government grants, and locally generated income such as fees, charges, and commercial activity. Because it covers such a wide array of services, the General Fund is subject to intense scrutiny and political debate, particularly during budget-setting periods.

“The General Fund is pivotal in governmental accounting, and its management is crucial for public accountability and the effective delivery of services.”

The flexibility of the General Fund allows councils to respond to emerging needs, invest in innovation, and reallocate resources as priorities shift. However, this flexibility is also constrained by statutory duties, political pressures, and the need to maintain balanced budgets.

The Housing Revenue Account (HRA)

In contrast, the Housing Revenue Account is a ring-fenced sub-account within the broader council finances, dedicated solely to the management of council-owned housing stock. It is not a separate fund in legal terms, but it is treated as a distinct financial entity for accounting purposes. The HRA records all income and expenditure related to council housing – including rent collection, service charges, repairs and maintenance, capital investment, and debt servicing. The ring-fence around the HRA is statutory, meaning councils are legally prohibited from using HRA funds to support General Fund services, and vice versa. This ensures that tenants’ rent payments are used exclusively for housing-related purposes, safeguarding the integrity of housing services and protecting tenants from cross-subsidising unrelated council activities.

“The HRA is not a separate fund but a ring-fenced account of certain defined transactions… there is no general discretion to breach the ring-fence.” – GOV.UK Guidance

The HRA is funded primarily through rental income, supplemented by service charges and, in some cases, capital receipts or borrowing. Councils must carefully balance the HRA to ensure it remains financially viable, particularly in the face of rising maintenance costs, decarbonisation targets, and pressures to build new homes.

Why the Distinction Matters

The statutory ring-fence around the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) is not just a technical accounting rule – it is a legal and ethical safeguard designed to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in how councils manage public money. This ring-fence means that local authorities are prohibited by law from using HRA funds to subsidise services delivered through the General Fund, and vice versa. In practical terms, this ensures that tenants’ rents and housing charges are used exclusively to maintain and improve council housing, rather than being diverted to support unrelated services such as libraries, highways, or adult social care.

“While the ‘housing ring fence’ prevents an authority from transferring resources between the HRA and the General Fund, there is nothing to stop an authority transferring resources between Housing General Fund and other General Fund Services.” – AWICS Briefing Paper

This separation is not just a matter of compliance – it is a cornerstone of financial integrity in local government. It protects tenants from effectively subsidising wider council services and ensures that housing investment decisions are made based on housing needs and priorities, not short-term pressures elsewhere in the council’s budget.

Understanding and respecting this boundary is essential for professionals across departments. It enables:

• Accurate and transparent budgeting: Knowing which fund pays for what helps avoid misallocations and ensures that financial plans are robust and legally sound.

• Avoidance of legal breaches: Misuse of HRA funds can lead to serious consequences, including audit challenges, reputational damage, and potential clawback of funds.

• Strategic housing investment: Councils can plan long-term improvements to their housing stock, including decarbonisation, safety upgrades, and new build programmes, with confidence that the funding is protected.

• Resilience under financial pressure: When councils face cuts or unexpected costs, understanding the limits of each fund helps leaders make informed, lawful decisions without compromising essential services.

Case Studies: Bringing It to Life

Southwark Council – A System Under Strain

Southwark Council is facing a projected £1 billion loss over the next 30 years, largely due to national rent policy changes and inflationary pressures. This has placed immense strain on its HRA, forcing the council to make difficult choices about where to allocate limited resources.

“Many housing revenue accounts are on the brink of collapse. Rather than increasing supply, councils are having to refocus their limited resources on keeping existing residents safe.” – Kieron Williams, Leader of Southwark Council

This case illustrates how even well-managed HRAs can become vulnerable when national policy shifts or economic shocks occur. It also highlights the importance of maintaining the ring-fence to ensure that essential safety and maintenance work is prioritised, even when new development ambitions must be scaled back.

Rotherham Council – Balancing Debt and Delivery

Rotherham Council allocates 14% of its rental income to service a substantial £350 million HRA debt. Despite this financial burden, the council has managed to build or acquire over 600 new homes since 2018, often stepping in where private developers have pulled out.

“It’s about acting as a first mover,” says James Clark, Assistant Director of Housing. “But the more we spend on new housing, the less there is to increase thermal comfort in older properties.”

This example shows the trade-offs councils must navigate within the HRA. While the ring-fence protects housing funds, it also requires councils to make tough decisions about how to balance new supply, debt servicing, and existing stock maintenance – all within a fixed financial envelope.

Temporary Accommodation Transfers – A Tactical Shift

In response to mounting financial pressures and the need to optimise housing-related expenditure, some councils are exploring the strategic transfer of temporary accommodation units from the General Fund to the Housing Revenue Account (HRA). This move is not merely administrative – it reflects a deeper shift in how local authorities are seeking to stabilise their housing finances and unlock new opportunities for investment.

Temporary accommodation, often used to house homeless households or those in urgent need, has traditionally been funded through the General Fund. However, this can place a significant strain on council budgets, especially when demand is high and rental income is limited. By transferring these units into the HRA, councils can take advantage of a more predictable and sustainable funding model, underpinned by rental income and long-term housing investment strategies.

“By moving these units to the HRA, authorities can benefit from the more stable financing structure… including access to rental income and reduced reliance on General Fund resources.” – Arlingclose Insight

This approach also allows councils to integrate temporary accommodation into their wider housing asset management plans, potentially improving standards, reducing costs, and enhancing outcomes for residents. However, it requires careful financial modelling and legal due diligence to ensure compliance with the ring-fence and avoid unintended consequences.

The Strategic Imperative – Beyond Accounting

As councils grapple with rising costs, evolving regulatory frameworks, and the urgent need to meet net-zero carbon targets, the distinction between the General Fund and the HRA becomes more than a matter of accounting – it becomes a strategic lever for transformation.

The ability to make informed decisions about where and how to invest public money is central to the future of local government. Whether it’s retrofitting housing stock, expanding affordable housing supply, or maintaining core services, understanding the boundaries and flexibilities of each fund empowers leaders to act with confidence and clarity.

“The capability to align HRA income resources with expenditure liabilities over the long term depends on predictable rent policies and flexible funding.” – Savills for LGA

Strategic use of the HRA can enable councils to unlock borrowing capacity, attract external investment, and deliver long-term value for tenants. Meanwhile, the General Fund must be managed with agility to respond to shifting demands and political priorities. Together, these funds form the financial architecture of local government – and understanding how they interact is key to unlocking smarter outcomes.

Final Thoughts – A Call to Financial Literacy and Leadership

For professionals working in and around local government – whether in finance, housing, planning, or executive leadership – understanding the difference between the General Fund and the HRA is not just a technical skill. It is a foundation for protecting public value, ensuring legal compliance, and delivering better outcomes for communities.

As councils face increasing complexity and scrutiny, the ability to navigate these financial structures with confidence will be essential. It enables better decision-making, stronger partnerships, and more resilient services. Ultimately, it’s about ensuring that every pound of public money is used wisely, transparently, and in service of the people who depend on it most.